Sheila Mata-Action Research Plan
|
||||
Goal: To assess the perception of professional
development amongst teachers in my campus, find out ways to make those
sessions more meaningful, and identify the type of support needed for
practices to be implemented with fidelity.
|
||||
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s)
Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
1.
Met
with site supervisor to discuss professional development as an improvement
area for our campus and current teacher selection criteria for attendance.
|
Sheila
Mata
|
March
6, 2013
|
None
|
Review
practices for teacher attendance of professional development sessions.
|
2.
Literature
review on professional development
|
Sheila
Mata
|
March
2013-July 2013
|
Lamar
Online Library
Internet
|
Review
and
identify
literature that highlights key points of effective professional development
|
3.
E-mail
teachers in my campus with background and reasoning behind my action research
plan.
|
Sheila
Mata
|
March
2013-April 2013
|
E-chalk
|
N/A
|
4.
Conduct
teacher survey on perceptions of professional development
|
Sheila
Mata
|
May
1, 2013-May 31, 2013
|
Surveymonkey.com
|
Review
surveys and identify differences between new and veteran teachers.
|
5.
E-mail
teachers deadline timeframe for completion of surveys and focus group
meetings
|
Sheila
Mata
|
May
1, 2013-May 31, 2013
|
E-chalk
|
N/A
|
6.
Meet
with focus group for teacher discussions on professional development
|
Sheila
Mata
|
May
1, 2013-May 31, 2013
|
*Team
leaders for every grade level
*Questionnaire
on professional development
|
Field
notes on focus group discussion.
|
7.
Attend
Trainer of Trainers Workshops
|
Sheila
Mata
|
June
2013-August 2013
|
La
Joya ISD Calendar of Summer Workshops
|
Identify
key points of highly effective professional development in attended workshop
|
8.
Plan
for summer staff development session using literature review on components of
highly effective professional development
|
Sheila
Mata
|
July
2013-August 2013
|
Material/content
for staff development
Literature
review
|
Review
plan for staff development session and identify components mentioned in
literature review.
|
9.
Meet
with site supervisor to present plan for staff development session and
identify any problem areas or resources needed.
|
Sheila
Mata
|
July
2013-August 2013
|
Material/content
for staff development
Literature
review
|
Review
plan for allocation of resources.
|
10.
Conduct
a staff development session
|
Sheila
Mata
|
August
1, 2013-August 30, 2013
|
Material/content
for staff development
|
Evaluation
form from teachers
|
11.
Obtain
teacher evaluation of my staff development session
|
Sheila
Mata
|
August
1, 2013-August 30, 2013
|
Staff
development evaluation form
|
Collection
and review of evaluation forms
|
12.
Monitor
teachers implementation of learned content during staff development session
and provide needed support
|
Sheila
Mata
M.
Ramos
|
August
2013-November 2013
|
Monitoring
& Feedback form
|
Field
notes on monitoring and discussion with teachers.
|
13.
Conduct
final teacher survey on support received after staff development session.
|
Sheila
Mata
|
December
2013
|
Surveymonkey.com
|
Review
teacher surveys and compare results to first survey.
|
14.
Share
project findings with administration, teachers, and curriculum coordinators.
|
Sheila
Mata
|
January
2014
|
*Action
Research Artifacts/Results
*Power
Point
*Literature
Review
*Educational
Blog:
|
Collect
and review evaluation form on presentation, blog comments, and e-mail
feedback.
|
15.
Meet
with site supervisor to discuss how research findings can improve campus
professional development procedures/effectiveness for 2014-2015 school year.
|
Sheila
Mata
M.
Ramos
|
January
2014
|
*Action
Research Artifacts/Results
*Literature
Review
|
Feedback
from site supervisor.
|
16.
Revisit
my action research plan, post it in school website, as well as educational
blog for sharing and continuous improvement opportunities
|
Sheila
Mata
M.
Ramos
M.
Alaniz (Technology Specialist)
|
January
2013
|
*Action
Research Artifacts/Results
*Power
Point
*Literature
Review
*Educational
Blog:
|
Review
comments and feedback from site supervisor, curriculum coordinators, and
colleagues.
|
Saturday, March 23, 2013
Approved Action Research Plan
I was finally able to meet with my site supervisor on Friday and get my final approval for my Action Research Plan. We went thru each activity, the time frame, how I will be collecting data, and the challenges that could come up as I implement my plan. There were no major revisions made to my plan, except for two things that I was already planning on doing, except I hadn't included them in my template. I've added a section for dissemination of background information and reasoning behind my research to encourage teacher buy-in, as well as a time frame for teachers that will serve as a guide for completion deadlines and meeting dates, like surveys, focus group meetings, etc. These two activities will be done with plenty of time before I begin with my first campus activity, which is surveying teachers. I also extended the time frame for my observations to give me enought time to observe every teacher. This made my research extend till January, but I think it's the best thing so that I have enough time to implement every component of my research plan, while not neglicting my duties and responsibilities as a teacher. So, without further ado, here's my FINAL & APPROVED Action Research Plan!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I think your topic is super important!!! Your plan is very well thought out and written. What is the focus of the professional development: classroom management, specific content, technology...I think it might be too much to tackle all professional development. I am very interested in learning from you research.
ReplyDeleteMy project could use some comments...if you get a change :) Thanks
http://jessicasactionresearchblog.blogspot.com/
Thank you for your comment Jessica! I really appreciate it. My focus for the professional development will be on Effective Writing Techniques. Being a 4th grade teacher, I see the need for effective writing instruction across grade levels. We're currently following a writing curriculum developed by our district coordinators, but I still see many students who struggle with writing by the time they reach 4th grade. So I wanted to offer a training based on techniques that have been proved effective and encourage teachers to use the in their daily writing lessons.
ReplyDeleteSheila: This looks very well planned out and thorough. Your topic is definitely an important one. I look forward to following your progress and results.
ReplyDeleteLooks great. I like where you have included in your action steps to attend training this summer. Also when you mentioned meeting with fidelity, does that mean for teachers who are having trouble, they can meet and get help without being thought of as lacking skills etc. I was not sure what you truly meant. Teachers should be included more in staff development, and have a say so on what they are lacking from the school and their needs met during staff development training. An example would be to have a list of teachers to attend certain rooms for specific training as we do with our stduents who have to get tutoring in certain subjects.
ReplyDeleteThanks Donald! What I meant with by the term fidelity was in regards to the implementation of curriculum or strategies learned in a professional developement session. I've heard many teachers complain about staff development sessions they've previously attended. Some say they don't target the type of students they have, or that they weren't engaging at all, that it was just a presenter reading off the slides without using real examples or putting into practice whatever strategy they're presenting. So teachers don't really put into practice what was learned during the session. My goal is to find out what teachers are looking for in professional development so that whatever they learn is implemented in an effective and consisten manner in their classroom so that it can impact student achievement.
DeleteYour revisions are exactly what came up in my meeting with my site supervisor. Presentation of the action research plan to the staff. The end result of my plan is to be able to empower teachers and to motivate their students. I too have heard many complaints from teachers about useless staff development. I hope to get through this research with the end result being that staff development session are presented by the teachers a majority of the time. Too many times I feel that administrators are more interested in reminding the staff about who their boss is rather than give staff something beneficial to the improvement of student performance. Nice job!
ReplyDelete